Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-oscore-edhoc-09

2023-11-23 Thread jmh.direct
Thank you Marco.  Those changes address my comments and I think make the document clearer.Yours,JoelSent via the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G, an AT 5G smartphone Original message From: Marco Tiloca Date: 11/23/23 10:25 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Joel Halpern , gen-art@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10

2018-06-29 Thread jmh.direct
Thank you.  Those changes will do the trick.  I realize they are small.  They fix a lot of confusion. Yours,Joel PS:  While I think the absence of information on how the server knows / decides what to mount where is unfortunate, I understand that to be the WG agreement and therefore am not

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-18

2018-02-26 Thread jmh.direct
These changes very nicely address my concerns.b You should check with your chair,and AD before submitting a,revision. Thank you,Joel Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Miika Komu Date: 2/26/18 06:56

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

2017-01-27 Thread jmh.direct
Thank you.That seems a reasonable compromise among the constraints.  Ypyrs,Joel Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Ben Campbell Date: 1/27/17 14:17 (GMT-06:00) To: marianne.moh...@orange.com Cc: Joel Halpern