lane."
and Greg has said he will fix that so I think that there is now no problem.
The I-D uses d-ACH elsewhere to refer to the Header and not the channel.
Tom petch
/Loa
>
> RFC7214 reorganised the IANA registres and gets the name right and may be the
> best reference.
>
>
any more, it is G-ACh
RFC5586 still uses G-ACH
RFC7214 reorganised the IANA registres and gets the name right and may be the
best reference.
I am not sure where G-ACh first appeared but it was much dicussed in and
around MPLS-TP, Loa might know or else Adrian.
Tom Petch
Sent via a website that tra
ay depend on whether or not this RFC is
made Normative.
And the TLP in the YANG module is out of date
Tom Petch
On 25/01/2022 10:26, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General A
From: Eliot Lear
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2022 16:28
To: tom petch; gen-art@ietf.org; Russ Housley
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] some YANG thoughts on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-03
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your review. Please see below
h expanded abbreviations
Why have a grouping and a uses which for me makes the module harder to
understand? It is not as if this grouping is going to be imported in lots of
places AFAICT.
Tom Petch
Major Concerns:
Section 1 says:
To satisfy these two key use cases, objects may be found in one o
been folded to fit the
rules of the RFC Editor but YANG/XML does not want them folded.
This is usually accompanied with a reference to
draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding RFC8792
Tom Petch
Regards,
Ulrich
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@iet
.14
- Security Consideratrions does not include the required YANG
considerations which in turn generates further Normative References
- Appendix A
/The secification/The specification/
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "tom petch"
To: "Michael Richardson"
Cc
seeing if I can switch from ietf to Last Call
inline
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Richardson"
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 10:06 PM
> tom petch wrote:
> > Looking some more at this I-D, I have more concerns about the
YANG
> > modu
cification/
Sorry for the bitty postings; more haste less speed.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "tom p."
To: "Alissa Cooper" ; "Dan Romascanu"
Cc: ;
; ;
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of
draft-ie
e-mail addresses for the YANG module are the same as
those for the YANG module in RFC8366; I do not know which are correct.
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/anima/>
should be https: and usually points to datatracker.ietf.org not tools
Tom Petch
- Original Message
Dan
I had a quick look at the YANG and it does indeed need some work IMHO.
I have posted a separate e-mail listing what I saw.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Romascanu via Datatracker"
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 9:39 AM
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Revi
11 matches
Mail list logo
