Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

2017-02-23 Thread Randall Gellens
At 10:34 AM -0500 2/23/17, Dale R. Worley wrote: Randall Gellens writes: Thanks, Dale. It seems that it would be useful for the draft to suggest (not require) that a session rejected due to lack of mutually-supported languages use 488 or 606, and also include a Warning header field with

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

2017-02-22 Thread Randall Gellens
At 10:42 AM -0500 2/22/17, Dale R. Worley wrote: Gunnar Hellström writes: A. Call failure If a call fails due to no available language match, in what way(s) does it fail? Section 5.3 says If such an offer is received, the receiver MAY reject the media, ignore the language s

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

2017-02-22 Thread Randall Gellens
At 11:57 AM +0100 2/22/17, Gunnar Hellström wrote: A few comments inline, Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens: Hi Dale, Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline. At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote: Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Re

Re: [Gen-art] [Slim] Review of draft-ietf-slim-negotiating-human-language-06

2017-02-22 Thread Gunnar Hellström
A few comments inline, Den 2017-02-22 kl. 02:44, skrev Randall Gellens: Hi Dale, Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline. At 6:32 PM -0800 2/17/17, Dale Worley wrote: Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this