-art-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Alissa
> Cooper
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 11:47 PM
> *To:* Suresh Krishnan
> *Cc:* i...@ietf.org Discussion; i...@ietf.org; Gen art;
> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb@ietf.org; Nabil Benamar
> *Subject:* Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave
org; Nabil Benamar
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [ipwave] Genart telechat review of
draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47
I reviewed the -49 version so my questions are on that version.
Alissa
On Jul 10, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan
mailto:sur...@kaloom.com>> wrote:
Hi Nabil,
Roni's
Dear Alissa,
I have previously replied to Roni as follows:
If we look at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8065 which recommends the
generic https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8064, we can say that we comply by
inheritance from Ethernet since our current draft is targeted at using the
RFC 2464 (plus
I reviewed the -49 version so my questions are on that version.
Alissa
> On Jul 10, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
> Hi Nabil,
> Roni's telechat review is for the version on which I issued the ballot (in
> this case it is -47). If you think the issue is resolved in a later
Hi Alissa,
Thank you for your review. However, I have updated the draft and now it's
in -49 reflecting previous comments.
Best regards
Nabil Benamar
---
نبيل بنعمرو
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 7:29 PM Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Roni, thanks for your review. Alex, Nabil, thanks
