I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
On 1/31/2014 8:55 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
First, there are good arguments for publication as Informational , but
since it incrementally adds to BCP 72, it should be incorporated
there, so BCP is slightly better.
It does?
It does not say it does.
So that linkage is something the reviewer is
Thanks Scott.
In the interest of being clear about my position, I support publication
of 04 but do not support publication of 05.
I think all the discussion that is useful has happened and all that
remains is the consensus call from the sponsoring AD.
On Friday, January 31, 2014, Sam Hartman wrote:
Thanks Scott.
In the interest of being clear about my position, I support publication
of 04 but do not support publication of 05.
I don't know why you object 05.
I think all the discussion that is useful has happened and all that
remains is