BTW, and for the record, this discussion addressed all of my comments.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Dec 11, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
(IETF list removed from cc list)
Comments:
A few minor nits that should not block anything:
-- Is this
On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
(IETF list removed from cc list)
Comments:
A few minor nits that should not block anything:
-- Is this a sieve wg submission or and individual submission? The
title looks like an individual, but it's listed as a wg submission in
the datatra
(IETF list removed from cc list)
Comments:
A few minor nits that should not block anything:
-- Is this a sieve wg submission or and individual submission? The
title looks like an individual, but it's listed as a wg submission in
the datatracker. (The answer to this does not change my revie
Ben Campbell wrote:
[Apologies for the lateness of this review. I somehow mis-recorded
the due date. Here's my review hoping late is better than never.]
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alv
[Apologies for the lateness of this review. I somehow mis-recorded the
due date. Here's my review hoping late is better than never.]
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/ar
