Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

Kevin: > This is probably my fault. I didn't think it was wise to submit a > new version of the I-D until all of the comments & corrections had > been collected. I didn't want folks trying to review a moving target, > especially since a change in paragraph A might affect the interpretation > of

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

This is probably my fault. I didn't think it was wise to submit a new version of the I-D until all of the comments & corrections had been collected. I didn't want folks trying to review a moving target, especially since a change in paragraph A might affect the interpretation of paragraph B. -

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

I am looking at this draft in order to fill in my recommendations for tonight’s IESG telechat. Ben, thank you for your review which pointed out worries (and I agreed with those), and thank you Kevin for the responses (which made sense to me). However, in addition to the major/minor issue discus

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

Hi Kevin, For the record, based on your comments I now consider the SSRC text to be a minor issue rather than a major one. Comments inline (again, deleting parts that seem closed) On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Igoe, Kevin M. wrote: [...] > > Does the "source" in each source mean the synch

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

Ben: Comment inline. As I mention below, the fact that SRTP places key management out of scope is an annoyance when dealing with SSRC management. +-- Kevin M. Igoe | "We can't solve problems by using the same kind kmi...@nsa.g

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

Hi, thanks for the response. Further comments inline. I will remove sections that do not appear to need further comment: On Sep 15, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Igoe, Kevin M. wrote: > Ben et al: > > Here is the reasoning behind some of the issues you raise. At least one > of them (SSRC re-use) is secu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

Ben et al: Here is the reasoning behind some of the issues you raise. At least one of them (SSRC re-use) is security critical. = SSRC Management: "If I read this section correctly, the draft requires central management

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14 Rev