Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 10/08/2016 14:09, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Brian, > I believe we got a warning from xml2rfc when we didn’t use the pre-2008 > disclaimer (since the draft “updates” RFC 2328). That's correct, it generates such a warning, but it's more in the form of a question ("do you need this?" not "yo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-09 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Brian, I believe we got a warning from xml2rfc when we didn’t use the pre-2008 disclaimer (since the draft “updates” RFC 2328). Thanks, Acee On 8/8/16, 6:32 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >Hi, > >That's all good. With the clarifcations, I think the "Updates" is OK too. >I still don't think

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-08 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi, That's all good. With the clarifcations, I think the "Updates" is OK too. I still don't think you need the pre-2008 disclaimer, but that's a nit. Thanks Brian On 09/08/2016 09:27, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote: > Please see -07 version that should address the issues raised by Brian (excep

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-08 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Please see -07 version that should address the issues raised by Brian (except that "update" part). https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-07 Thanks. Jeffrey > -Original Message- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 5:02

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-08 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Brian, See one inline. On 8/8/16, 4:18 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >Hi Acee, > >Thanks, just a few points in line: > >On 09/08/2016 05:47, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I discussed your >>comments >> this morning. See res

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-08 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Acee, Thanks, just a few points in line: On 09/08/2016 05:47, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I discussed your comments > this morning. See responses to your major/minor comments below. We will > incorporate all the nits. > > On 8/6

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-08 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Brian, Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I discussed your comments this morning. See responses to your major/minor comments below. We will incorporate all the nits. On 8/6/16, 9:38 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

2016-08-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at