Thank you Paul for the in-depth review, and for the discussion, and thank you
Donald for the edits.
At this point I think I’m ready to say “no-objection” for this document in
tonight’s IESG telechat.
Jari
On 07 Jul 2016, at 01:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 7/6/16 5:18
On 7/6/16 5:18 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
Donald,
On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your
comments.
Looks good except for
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> Donald,
>
> On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your
>> comments.
>
>
> Looks good except for one thing:
>
> Some of the
Donald,
On 7/5/16 9:51 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your comments.
Looks good except for one thing:
Some of the new text in section 7 has me baffled:
The following processes should be followed in interpreting sets of
Hi Paul,
Version -09 has been uploaded with the intent that it resolve your comments.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Paul Kyzivat
On 7/4/16 11:35 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
I believe we are generally in agreement.
On the table in the IANA Considerations, I have read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-15#section-1.1
and I can understand why you commented as you did. But, since all the
Hi Paul,
I believe we are generally in agreement.
On the table in the IANA Considerations, I have read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-15#section-1.1
and I can understand why you commented as you did. But, since all the
table entries were created by IANA actions, I
Donald,
On 7/4/16 5:26 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments. Sorry for the delay in response.
Please see below.
No problem. I was just concerned that my review hadn't been received.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
I am
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments. Sorry for the delay in response.
Please see below.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Paul Kyzivat
wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
[Resending in case it wasn't received, since I have received no replies.]
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other
last
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other
last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at
11 matches
Mail list logo