Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi all, After discussing with Jouni, authors, chairs, Lou and our AD, we will update the draft with the following changes to clarify Jouni's concern: In the Abstract and Introduction, add: "It is intended that technology-specific documents will reference this document to describe specific uses.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi Daniele, > On Oct 17, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Daniele Ceccarelli > wrote: > > Hi Jouni, > > Thanks a lot for your review and your thoughts. I tend to agree with you, > publishing a document referencing a future one doesn't make much sense. > We had a long discussion inside the WG on how to pro

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi Jouni, Thanks a lot for your review and your thoughts. I tend to agree with you, publishing a document referencing a future one doesn't make much sense. We had a long discussion inside the WG on how to progress this draft with many alternative options and this one happened to be the less pain

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi, > On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Yemin (Amy) wrote: > > Hi Jouni, > > You're right that the current draft text doesn't provide any information > about the discussion. > So how about add the following text at the end of section 3.1: > This document only defines the Availability TLV, how the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi Jouni, You're right that the current draft text doesn't provide any information about the discussion. So how about add the following text at the end of section 3.1: This document only defines the Availability TLV, how the existing Switching Capability makes use of the Availability TLV wil

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi, > On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:06 AM, Yemin (Amy) wrote: > > Hi Jouni, > > Thanks very much for the comments. I fixed the nits in the draft. > > Regarding the Switching Capability-specific information field, we had the > discussion in WG, and here's the summary/conclusion: > It's decided that

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

Hi Jouni, Thanks very much for the comments. I fixed the nits in the draft. Regarding the Switching Capability-specific information field, we had the discussion in WG, and here's the summary/conclusion: It's decided that this document will just define the availability TLV, and a new draft will

[Gen-art] Gen-ATR review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at