s <elw...@folly.org.uk>
Cc: General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of
ge
> From: "Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgir...@cisco.com>
> Date: 04/08/2016 21:40 (GMT+00:00)
> To: Elwyn Davies <elw...@folly.org.uk>
> Cc: General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
> draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: G
ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24
Elwyn,
Thank you for the review. We should be able to address these issues. See my
comments inline..
Minor issues:
Interoperability with H.323
The requir
> Date: 04/08/2016 21:40 (GMT+00:00) To: Elwyn Davies
<elw...@folly.org.uk> Cc: General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id....@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-24
Elwyn,
Thank you for the review.
Elwyn,
Thank you for the review. We should be able to address these issues. See my
comments inline..
>
> Minor issues:
> Interoperability with H.323
> The requirements for the Session Identifier [RFC7206] Section 4.2 stresses
> interoperability with H.323. This is mentioned in passing in s1
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
