Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

> On Jan 5, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > Hi, Tom. > > The existence of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530-migration-update was pointed out to > me this evening. After a cursory read I realised that SETCLIENTID had been > MNI'd in 4.1 so that there is a minor

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

Hi, Tom. The existence of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530-migration-update was pointed out to me this evening. After a cursory read I realised that SETCLIENTID had been MNI'd in 4.1 so that there is a minor infelicity in the comments in minorversion2-dot-x (and in 4.1). The comment here: ///

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > Hi, Tom. > > Excellent... so I think we are done with dot-x. > > One additional point that I was going to write into the main minorversion2 > review relating to referencing the requirements RFC 7204.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

Hi, Tom. Excellent... so I think we are done with dot-x. One additional point that I was going to write into the main minorversion2 review relating to referencing the requirements RFC 7204. rpcsec-gssv3 also references the requirements RFC but the amount of info that is needful to support

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

> On Dec 13, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at