Bringing this to the attention of the PWE3 WG
since that need to know that this discussion is happening
and will have a view as to what is already well
known in terms of RFC4447 behavior and what
needs clarification via this draft.
Stewart
On 21/06/2012 13:38, Elwyn Davies wrote:
Hi, Lizhong.
Please can you continue this conversation with the PWE3
WG in the cc list so that it has the correct level of expert
oversight.
Thanks
Stewart
On 21/06/2012 15:43, Lizhong Jin wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Please see inline below.
Thanks
Lizhong
Elwyn Davies elw...@folly.org.uk wrote 2012/06/21
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you for the review. It seems you are reviewing v-03, not v-04, but
some comments are for v-04. I am confused. See my reply inline below.
Regards
Lizhong
Elwyn Davies elw...@folly.org.uk wrote 2012/06/19 20:12:17:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For
Hi, Lizhong.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:48 +0800, Lizhong Jin wrote:
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you for the review. It seems you are reviewing v-03, not v-04,
but some comments are for v-04. I am confused.
Yes, I started reviewing v03 but had to stop because of other tasks and
came back to v04. I
