Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-09

2023-10-13 Thread Lars Eggert
Dale, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Oct 6, 2023, at 23:05, Dale Worley via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-09

2023-10-12 Thread Dale R. Worley
Donald Eastlake writes: >> Currently, only two registries are given full references: >> [...] > > I think adding such references for every mentioned registry would be > somewhat unworkable for very little return. Yes, it seems like that to me, too. But is there a reason that two registries are m

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-09

2023-10-09 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi Dale, Thanks for this review. See below. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 4:05 PM Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents bein

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-09

2023-10-06 Thread Dale Worley via Datatracker
Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more i