Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-18 Thread Peter Yee
Greg,     “PAM Framework” sounds fine. And I’m happy with the rest of the document. Thank you again for considering my input.     Kind regards,     -Peter On 10/18/23, 6:53 PM, "Greg Mirsky" wrote: Hi Peter,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-18 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Peter, thank you for your kind consideration of my notes. I have added a few new notes below under the GIM2>> tag. Attached, is the diff highlighting the updates resulting from our discussion. Regards, Greg On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:13 AM wrote: > Greg, > > > > Thanks for considering my

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-13 Thread peter
Greg, Thanks for considering my review comments. My responses to specific points are found below. Kind regards, -Peter From: Greg Mirsky Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 1:54 AM To: Peter Yee Cc: gen-art ;

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-11 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Peter, thank you for your thorough review and detailed comments. Please find my notes below under the GIM>> tag. I've attached the diff highlighting all the updates. Regards, Greg On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:42 AM Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-09 Thread Peter Yee via Datatracker
Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more