Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Dan, thanks for your review. I agree with your point about normatively
referencing RFC 6275; I think your other points may be taken up at the authors’
discretion. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review
Hi Dan,
Thank you very much for the thorough review.
Apologies for the delay. Procrastination and holiday came in the way.
See below.
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews a
Hi Ole,
Thanks for addressing my comments. All your answers to the minor and
editorial comments that I made are are fine with me.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you very much for the thorough review.
> Apologies for the delay. Procrastinati
On 01/05/2018 02:10, Ole Troan wrote:
>> 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to
>> RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added)
>
> Capitalisation done.
> I ended up leaning towards not referencing 8126. As most documents with IANA
> considerations don't. To
Brian,
>>> 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to
>>> RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added)
>>
>> Capitalisation done.
>> I ended up leaning towards not referencing 8126. As most documents with IANA
>> considerations don't. To be consistent.
>
> Really?
