"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes:
> Attached please find an updated version and diffs from previous.
> Please let me know if this adequately addresses your comments.
It looks good to me. (nit: Section 4 ends with two successive
periods.)
Dale
rg (ginsberg)
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis@ietf.org;
> isis-
> w...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IETF Last Call Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis-01
>
> "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsb...@cisco.com> writes:
> > Th
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes:
> Thanx for your detailed review. I have elected to copy the WG on my
> reply as you also sent a copy of your review to the WG.
I'm not sure if it is formally specified, but it seems to me that a
Gen-Art review really should be copied to the
version
addressing your comments.
Specific responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale R. Worley [mailto:wor...@ariadne.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 1:00 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis@ietf.org
> Subject: IETF Last Call
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at