[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06.txt

2006-12-08 Thread Hong-Yon Lach
Salut Francis, Thanks for your review and please see my comments inline... Cheers, Hong-Yon > From: Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:33:48 +0100 > To: Thierry Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > , Hong-Yon Lach <[EM

[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06.txt

2006-12-08 Thread Thierry Ernst
Hi, >Thanks for your review! No, there is no LC planned >for this document. In fact, we already dealt with it >in the IESG, and uncovered one technical issue that >needs to be addressed. > >I would ask the chairs to look into these issues >and list changes, if any, so that I can take them >into a

[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06.txt

2006-12-07 Thread Francis Dupont
In your previous mail you wrote: The definitions reads: 2.8. Correspondent Node (CN) Any node that is communicating with one or more MNNs. A CN could be either located within a fixed network or within another mobile network, and could be either fixed or mobile. So,

[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-nemo-terminology-06.txt

2006-12-04 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review! No, there is no LC planned for this document. In fact, we already dealt with it in the IESG, and uncovered one technical issue that needs to be addressed. I would ask the chairs to look into these issues and list changes, if any, so that I can take them into account in the