Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04

2009-06-18 Thread Scott Brim
kaushik allegedly wrote on 06/17/2009 7:14 PM: > Hi Scott, > > The IETF specification is authoritative as far as the PA & PB protocols > defined by the NEA WG since it represents work done by the IETF community on > the -00 version of the specification that was submitted by TNC. Contributors > to t

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04

2009-06-17 Thread kaushik
Hi Scott, The IETF specification is authoritative as far as the PA & PB protocols defined by the NEA WG since it represents work done by the IETF community on the -00 version of the specification that was submitted by TNC. Contributors to the PA & PB protocols in the NEA-WG include individuals who

[Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04

2009-06-17 Thread Scott Brim
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: d