Hi Joel,
Thank you for your review.
At 09:58 28-02-10, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Comment: I presume the use of domain names that are not formal
examples (are not compliant with 2606) is done in order to reduce
gratuitous changes from RFC 1652, which used the same domains names
for examples which
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-yam-r
