Note in fact this review was withdrawn but as I did it I am typing and sending it anyway. I warned the gen-art management and it seems the review came back to me.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20170317 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 20170411 Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - 3 page 6: if a TCP stream itself really supports very long mesages the encapsulation used in the document has a lower (but still large) limit (2^16 - sizeof(header) - 2). In general there are all provsions to discourage the use of TCP encapsulation when something simpler is available. I don't expect they will be strictly followed in the real world but IMHO you did the maximum for a spec document. Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
