Francis, Jeff - thanks for the review and the edits. Very much appreciated.
Jari
On 27 Jun 2014, at 05:54, Jeff Goldberg (jgoldber) jgold...@cisco.com wrote:
Dear Francis,
I’ve discussed this with a few people at Cisco who have done RFCs and we’ve
come to the conclusion that SHOULD and MAY
In your previous mail you wrote:
Dear Francis,
I've done the changes, but I need some more information:
4.2 page 9 (connection-address): (ambiguous wording)
... An IP address
SHOULD be used, but an FQDN MAY be used in place of an IP address.
[JIG] I'm not getting
Dear Francis,
I’ve done the changes, but I need some more information:
4.2 page 9 (connection-address): (ambiguous wording)
... An IP address
SHOULD be used, but an FQDN MAY be used in place of an IP address.
[JIG] I’m not getting the ambiguity. Unusually, we deliberately _are_
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-21.txt
