On 13/09/2011 03:31, phoebe ayers wrote:
> there are
> images in debatable circumstances (beach: public or not?)
In France there is a jurisprudence regarding photos of monuments and
other public places worthy of photography.
It states that you are allowed to have non consenting people on your
Couple thoughts:
*A few moderate Muslim editors chiming in on some of the things we
don't like either on Wikipedia wouldn't hurt.
*It would be nice if the most obvious of "corruption" of liberal or
libertarian views wasn't lascivious female nudity; but even the
Christian Conservatives have com
Anyway they can italic or bold this Phrase: " in a private place or
situation without permission." ??
On 9/12/2011 10:53 AM, Sydney Poore wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sarah Stierch
mailto:sarah.stie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have no clue how I missed this (and perhaps it's been p
Hi all,
A fellow woman who Wikis sent me a link to Girl Genius Webcomic's facebook
page. Carol, a staff member there, posted that artist Kaja Foglio's article
isn't that great and needs work, asking for help!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Girl-Genius-Webcomic/28371352860?sk=wall (I
don't know if
Unfortunately, I've known Phil and Kaja for years, so I'm a little
reluctant to touch it. Still, I'll see what I can do.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A fellow woman who Wikis sent me a link to Girl Genius Webcomic's facebook
> page. Carol, a staff member th
Hey folks,
http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2011/09/sue-gardner-on-wikipedias-gender-gap/
This is me being interviewed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
about our gender gap. It's raw (uncut) tape so it's long -- I am
guessing about 20 minutes. But you will probably find it interesting,
due to the
Awesome! I love how you compared the beginning of the list to the second
stage movement <3
Preaching the importance and social impact of the work we are doing - I'm
really glad you touched on this. I noticed when I did my interview with the
WMF storytellers that I got very emotional about the impa
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Sue Gardner wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2011/09/sue-gardner-on-wikipedias-gender-gap/
>
> This is me being interviewed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
> about our gender gap. It's raw (uncut) tape so it's long -- I am
> guessing about
I have created the new consent template:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
Here is an example of it in use:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Splitting_logs_with_a_gas_powered_log_splitter.JPG
I also added a new section to the
Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_persons gu
Oh, funny wife.
From,
Emily
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Michael J. Lowrey wrote:
> I recently attended a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador training, in which
> almost all the experienced Wiki hands were male and bearded, and the
> newbies were both female and not. When I recounted this to my wif
That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
release of the image? For example,
"I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video being taken and
released under a free licence."
Sarah
On Tue, Sep 13, 201
I agree. As you wrote this email, I was altering it to include the phrase
"consent to publish". Your wording is better, I'll change to that.
Toby/99of9
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Sarah wrote:
> That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
> release of the image?
I like the template and added it to a few of my uploads to see how it works.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simon_Planting_%28bassist%29_of_the_John_Jorgenson_Quintet-1.JPG
I like the change in wording Sarah suggests.
Sydney
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Sarah wrote:
> That looks g
I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
"I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video under
a free license, granting unrestricted rights to re
Another blatant violation of the Principle of least astonishment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_drive
Ryan Kaldari
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
hehehe. classic. :)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> Another blatant violation of the Principle of least astonishment:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_drive
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists
I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
create this.
The n00b in me asks :
1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
and the rest:
2) I think we should solidify the policy documentation (i.e. the recent
board passing, etc), and complete that w
:))
A.
--- On Wed, 14/9/11, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
From: Ryan Kaldari
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap humor
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wednesday, 14 September, 2011, 2:04
Another blatant violation of the Principle of least astonishment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_drive
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
> you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
> "I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
> specifically consented to publication of this photograph or vid
19 matches
Mail list logo
