As far as I remember the "nake-hub" of commons (As i call it) has no
problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of
commons, the "puritans" (several here in that list) who cant see a naked
picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay
or le
This is a great idea. We'll see if the bleating that the image is
"educational" is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC
wrote:
> On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
> I could have a go again, Carol. >:)
>
> Gay porn is underreprese
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> > No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article
> uses
> > a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German
> version
> > is more amateur
