We might be able to create one on one chats somehow on IRC or with
chatrooms. The concept makes sense.
Pine
On Aug 13, 2014 11:11 AM, "Emily Monroe" wrote:
> Sorry if my previous email seemed a little harsh or confused.
>
> I don't think a chatroom is non-confusing enough. One other way
> helpe
Research about the chatroom concept, not so much about IRC alone. We can't
practically run research projects about every change. Chatrooms would be a
major change and be resource intensive to start, so research makes sense
before starting this implementation.
Pine
Pine
On Aug 13, 2014 7:15 AM, "E
Sorry if my previous email seemed a little harsh or confused.
I don't think a chatroom is non-confusing enough. One other way
helpees often "fail hard" is that they confuse messages sent to other
helpees as being directed at them. They don't realize it's a public
chatroom. We would need a system w
Interesting. You were just talking about IRC and #wikipedia-en-help and not
using research, and now you have seem to given up.
From,
Emily
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Pine W wrote:
> The chat system mentioned by Quiddity may actually decrease the number of
> helpees in IRC by encouraging
As I've mentioned, the biggest problem we're having now is male attack
posts, female complaints about such attacks, generally
disruptive/tendentious threads which really are driving off people who
join the project, probably look at the page, and quickly leave.
I started this thread.
https://e