You're absolutely correct that the article does not have sufficient cites
in it to establish notability, but reread that sentence. "No assertions,
plausible or otherwise of notability" - that's a big difference than what
is required to pass an AfD, and the tag didn't belong here. The article
cont
I wrote, "The article as written contains no assertions, plausible or
otherwise, of notability. It reeks with redlinks and self-published
"sources". AS WRITTEN. I would have been equally dismissive of a guy name
Ron who claimed to be part of a Odinic priesthood; no more and no less.
On Sun, Jun 2
With Ruth having published articles in peer reviewed journals multiple
times that have been directly responded to by dozens of times, having her
work and ideas forming a significant part of a book by KS Coleman that
directly talks about Ruth's life experences, mentions her full name 20+
times as bo
The book may be notable while the author is not. It sounds like it's a
rehash of Joanna Russ' classic HOW TO SUPPRESS WOMEN'S WRITING.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Carol Moore dc
wrote:
> Dang, I should have found some refs first. See how out of practice I am!
> I was sure I'd read it alrea
i see brainyj drove by tag-spamed it , 2 years ago
recently, they can't be bothered with AfD, especially with old material
they concentrate on biting new editors articles.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Carol Moore dc
wrote:
> Dang, I should have found some refs first. See how out of practi
Dang, I should have found some refs first. See how out of practice I am!
I was sure I'd read it already was discussed by Time or something.
I'm sure that the bio will be quickly deleted, even after the book
published and reviewed, while thousands of male bios with no refs
survive. Sigh...
On
The article as written contains no assertions, plausible or otherwise, of
notability. It reeks with redlinks and self-published "sources".
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Carol Moore dc
wrote:
> It looks like her bio is being challenged just as the book she edited is
> starting to get reliable
It looks like her bio is being challenged just as the book she edited is
starting to get reliable source attention. In case anyone wants to work
on it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Barrett
The book is "Female Erasure: What You Need To Know About Gender
Politics’, War On Woman, the Femal
