I agree with Risker here.
Pine
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Risker wrote:
>
>
> On 12 February 2017 at 17:22, Jonathan Cardy
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Risker,
>>
>> Clearly not everyone would opt into it if there was an option to do so.
>> Do you object to the idea of developing an option to o
the poor archiving of state department predates the change over
i did some link rot repair using archive.is but there may be lost years
we should think about a program of archiving state urls, since they will
not do it.
jim
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Ellie Kesselman
wrote:
> I searched th
On 12 February 2017 at 17:22, Jonathan Cardy
wrote:
> Thanks Risker,
>
> Clearly not everyone would opt into it if there was an option to do so. Do
> you object to the idea of developing an option to opt in to email filtering?
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan/WereSpielChequers
>
>
>
Yes, I do, to be hone
Thanks Risker,
Clearly not everyone would opt into it if there was an option to do so. Do you
object to the idea of developing an option to opt in to email filtering?
Regards
Jonathan/WereSpielChequers
> On 12 Feb 2017, at 19:25, Risker wrote:
>
> I am extremely, extremely uncomfortable wit
I am extremely, extremely uncomfortable with email moderation. I cannot
emphasize this enough. Frankly, I'd rather the NSA be reading my mail than
my fellow Wikimedians - they have no actual interest in anything that I'm
writing. If moderation became standard, I'd shut off "email this user". It
wo
Thanks Ryan and Chris, I've endorsed the Bethnaught proposal which covers all
of this idea except the email filter bits. I think the privacy issues of a
moderated email stream can be resolved by OTRS style checking of the
moderators. As for the staffing issues I'm optimistic that there are plen