I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose
off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her
continuing
to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the
Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration
yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the
participation of some librarian editors
they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a
position to see personal identifying information.
they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well
this is
that was a nice editathon - Council on Foreign Relations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/CFR
yes, the drive by tagging by patrollers is mainly useless
if you used it as a process to add and remove tags is might work, but for
now it is adversive backlog creating for gnomes
Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the
WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF
harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper
trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could
actually find themselves face to
