I personally would prefer it not be split off, that smacks of sweeping it under the carpet. As far as "won't find these photos to be turned off by them" - I'm sorry, I'm missing the reasoning. What they don't know won't hurt them? It's ok to be offensive so long as no one notices? Low standards
Actually, I found the descriptions well written and helpful. I don't quite understand Sarah's objection.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology
From: Nepenthe topazbutter...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, May 17, 2013 9:34 pm
To:
It is not so much that it would violate civility, as that it would very likely soon violate Undue.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Men's_shelter Re: New WikiProject Feminism
Articles from WSG students
From: Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, June 05,
Men's shelters would fall under the Men's rights article probation which should help somewhat. A talkpage notice would have to be added, but it certainly fits the category of "Pages related to Men's rights (broadly construed)" which fall under that probation.-kc-
Original Message
