Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

e: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about > Gendergap on the English Wikipedia > > > On the other hand, I'd like to point out that the thread topic had already > drifted to internet comments when I commented. I'm not sure why I was > singled out. > &

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:51:22 -0500 To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia On the other hand, I'd like to point out that the thread topic had already drifted to internet comments

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

If any of you want to do something positive, maybe you can improve the WikiWomen's Lunch page and promote it to Women's groups in London? You don't have to be attending Wikimania to do either of these things. *Edward Saperia* Conferenc

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

Nathan, While I agree I shouldn't be admonished for "being the fourth in a row" (then again, I'm biased, so take that with an entire salt shaker), I don't think Val meant to be condescending, just like I didn't mean to derail the conversation. From, Emily On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Natha

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Leigh Honeywell wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nathan wrote: > > Hi Val, > > > > The discussion at that point was about Internet commenters. As you may > know, that's not quite how Wikimedia projects work, and certainly the > discussion wasn't referri

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

On the other hand, I'd like to point out that the thread topic had already drifted to internet comments when I commented. I'm not sure why I was singled out. And yes, what Janine-- someone who is sexist is also likely to be ablelist (spelling?), racist, classist, etc. From, Emily On Fri, Jul 11

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

Is there really a type of misogyny that stands alone from other nastiness? In my experience, those who make comments against women also do about other races, ethnics, sexual orientations, classes, etc. The problem with misogyny on Wikipedia is probably more that it is easier to know if another e

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nathan wrote: > Hi Val, > > The discussion at that point was about Internet commenters. As you may know, > that's not quite how Wikimedia projects work, and certainly the discussion > wasn't referring to commenters on a Wikimedia project. Emily can't be blamed >

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > > That is, as a result of comments like these, we end up having a > discussion about something other than women's participation in > Wikimedia projects. When this happens frequently, people end up > feeling discouraged from bringing up to

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

removed. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Tom Morris wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> That’s really cool. >> >>>> >> >>>> (Just don’t read the comments. Awful misogyn

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

that crap removed?) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Tom Morris > >>>> <http://tommorris.org/> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - Original message - > >&g

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

e comments. Awful misogyny contained therein. Is >>>> there any way we can get that crap removed?) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tom Morris >>>> <http://tommorris.org/> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Original message

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

> there any way we can get that crap removed?) >>> >>> -- >>> Tom Morris >>> <http://tommorris.org/> >>> >>> >>> - Original message ----- >>> From: Jane Darnell >>> To: Increasing female participation i

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

ments. Awful misogyny contained therein. Is >> there any way we can get that crap removed?) >> >> -- >> Tom Morris >> <http://tommorris.org/> >> >> >> - Original message - >> From: Jane Darnell >> To: Increasing female pa

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

t; <http://tommorris.org/> > > > - Original message - > From: Jane Darnell > To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects > > Subject: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about > Gendergap on the English Wikipedia > Date: Sun,

Re: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

ubject: [Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 12:54:55 +0200 In case you missed it, the Signpost this week gives a link to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP8QCG7keQw _ Gen

[Gendergap] Adrienne Wadewitz featured in short piece about Gendergap on the English Wikipedia

In case you missed it, the Signpost this week gives a link to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP8QCG7keQw ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap