I'm both a long-time admin on Commons and an OTRS volunteer. I've been
wanting to chime in on this thread, but haven't really had the time. I'm
worried though that I'm about to see history repeat itself, so I want to
quickly share a few thoughts...
First, the issue of consent on Commons has bee
--- On Mon, 12/9/11, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
First, the issue of consent on Commons has been passionately debates for
years, and has a long and tortured history. Before proposing anything,
please make yourself familiar with the previous discussions and their
outcomes. Most notably the discussions s
Here's something we might do though. Addition of any image which violates
anyone's privacy to any article can be suppressed on the English
Wikipedia. Using this policy: "Removal of non-public personal
information, such as phone numbers, home addresses, workplaces or
identities of pseudonymous or an
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> Here's something we might do though. Addition of any image which violates
> anyone's privacy to any article can be suppressed on the English
> Wikipedia. Using this policy: "Removal of non-public personal
> information, such as phone numbers, h
>
> As soon as I have some free time, I'll whip up such a template and throw
> it into the water. It'll be interesting to see how it is received.
>
> Ryan Kaldari
Ok, sounds like a plan. I'll make a noise in the east; you strike in the
west...
Fred
Hi Ryan,
A draft template was actually made to augment the mostly recently voted
[[COM:SEX]] proposal:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
The proposal closed with no consensus*, but with a few modifications, the
template could still be put to good use.
Toby / 99of9
*Mainly beca
I have created the new consent template:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent
Here is an example of it in use:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Splitting_logs_with_a_gas_powered_log_splitter.JPG
I also added a new section to the
Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_persons gu
That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
release of the image? For example,
"I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video being taken and
released under a free licence."
Sarah
On Tue, Sep 13, 201
I agree. As you wrote this email, I was altering it to include the phrase
"consent to publish". Your wording is better, I'll change to that.
Toby/99of9
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Sarah wrote:
> That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
> release of the image?
I like the template and added it to a few of my uploads to see how it works.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simon_Planting_%28bassist%29_of_the_John_Jorgenson_Quintet-1.JPG
I like the change in wording Sarah suggests.
Sydney
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Sarah wrote:
> That looks g
I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
"I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video under
a free license, granting unrestricted rights to re
I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
create this.
The n00b in me asks :
1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
and the rest:
2) I think we should solidify the policy documentation (i.e. the recent
board passing, etc), and complete that w
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
> you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
> "I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
> specifically consented to publication of this photograph or vid
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Ryan Kaldari
> wrote:
>> I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
>> you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
>> "I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
>> specifically consented to publication of this photograp
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 17:39, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> I added a new parameter to the template for indicating full consent. If
> you use {{consent|full}} it outputs:
> "I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
> specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video
On 14/09/2011 16:56, Sarah wrote:
> So the problem with the basic consent template as written -- "I
> personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
> specifically consented to this photograph or video" -- is that it
> implies to the unsuspecting that consent has been given to tak
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:25, Arnaud HERVE wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 16:56, Sarah wrote:
>> So the problem with the basic consent template as written -- "I
>> personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
>> specifically consented to this photograph or video" -- is that it
>> implies
On 9/13/11 8:03 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
> create this.
>
> The n00b in me asks :
>
> 1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
There aren't any categories currently, but I could add some. Right now,
yo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> On 9/13/11 8:03 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> > I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
> > create this.
> >
> > The n00b in me asks :
> >
> > 1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
>
> There
FloNight said:
> [snip]
It make no real difference what it is called, guideline or policy, as long
> as everyone one is singing from the same page in the hymnal. The deletion
> discussion over the past week, (and there have been many of them using lack
> of model consent as reason) have gone wel
20 matches
Mail list logo
