On 7 December 2011 14:58, Risker wrote:
> To be honest, I have my doubts as to the value of creating fancy charts
> about the installation (and the women it names). There's more value in
> ensuring each has a quality article than there is in focusing on their
> representation in this one art pie
To be honest, I have my doubts as to the value of creating fancy charts
about the installation (and the women it names). There's more value in
ensuring each has a quality article than there is in focusing on their
representation in this one art piece.
Gotta admit, thoughI remember seeing this
Yes please!
I've yet to see it in person! :(
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Pharos wrote:
> I've actually been in touch in the past with the Brooklyn Museum's tech guru
> Shelley about just this article, and possible colla
I've actually been in touch in the past with the Brooklyn Museum's tech
guru Shelley about just this article, and possible collaboration on the
1,038 related women's biographies :)
If you're not in touch with her already, of course I'd be glad to introduce
you.
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On S
Hi folks,
The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dinner_Party - which is about
the artwork by feminist artist and writer Judy Chicago, has some issues.
The issues lie in the "lists" that cover all the women featured in the
installation.
I'm in the process of a research project about the pie
