On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Béria Lima wrote:
> Hi Erin.
>
> First we are - and we never - discussed "*Content that deals primarily
> with women is systematically underdeveloped throughout the projects*"
> what we did discussed here was 3 or 4 articles *from en.wiki* that Sarah
> thinks need
This is exactly where my problem comes from : en-wiki is not "wikipedia"
but one of many wikipedias, and wikipedias is not "Wikimedia project". Just
to illustrate how the discussion pimp vs madam is cultural-biased, in
French wikipedia, the inter-wiki for pimp is "proxénétisme" ("hustling")
and the
Hi Erin.
First we are - and we never - discussed "*Content that deals primarily with
women is systematically underdeveloped throughout the projects*" what we
did discussed here was 3 or 4 articles *from en.wiki* that Sarah thinks
need to be remade. As far as I know, we have more than 700 projects.
I'll echo Kevin's words, as I couldn't have said it better myself:
"To me, article differentials like this are one of the most interesting
manifestations of the gender gap, and are worth talking about on this list.
Content that deals primarily with women is systematically underdeveloped
throughout
