Shouldn't this discussion be taking place *on* the LGBT list? ;-)
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:09 AM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> WMF could put up funding for research to be done by experts.
>
> On Jul 6, 2012 2:06 PM, wrote
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 07:11, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:47:58 +0100, Tom Morris wrote
> > I'm not sure I agree that LGBT is another gender gap.
>
>
>
> my impression is that there certainly are gender gaps in LGBTIQA* communities
> - if ever non-heterosexual
> peop
WMF could put up funding for research to be done by experts.
On Jul 6, 2012 2:06 PM, wrote:
> Hi John
>
> > havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
> > wikimedia community -
> > these studies tend to be very simplistic due to lack
> > if understanding or inadequate fund
Hi John
> havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
> wikimedia community -
> these studies tend to be very simplistic due to lack
> if understanding or inadequate funding, and/or riddled with bias without
> explanation.
so here we can definitely point to a common concer
Hi Claudia. There are good numbers for LGBT in real world populations, and
the people doing the studies are all to aware of the problems with their
numbers - there are journals dedicated to research in this discipline. i
havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
wikimedia
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:47:58 +0100, Tom Morris wrote
> I'm not sure I agree that LGBT is another gender gap.
my impression is that there certainly are gender gaps in LGBTIQA* communities -
if ever non-heterosexual
people are happy to be lumped together just because of not identifying
non-hetero
thanks, Ryan
so this seems clear now: there may be different kinds of difficulties in a list
creation process and all of these
are now solved as regards the new lgbt list, is that it?
cheers
Claudia
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:51:57 -0700, Ryan Kaldari wrote
> Just to clarify, Phillipe expressed co
Just to clarify, Phillipe expressed concern that there were only 4
people listed as potential participants. The main objection was from
MZMcBride (who is not associated with the WMF), who expressed concern
that the list would be used for POV-pushing. Subsequently, Sébastien
Santoro and two WMF
On Monday, 2 July 2012 at 06:24, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
> Hi Tom, hi @all
>
> > Wikimedia have decided to allow the list to be created
>
> since we are addressing not only one gender gap but, seemingly quite a few,
> including those that come alonf
> the lines of what has come to be called
Hi Tom, hi @all
> Wikimedia have decided to allow the list to be created
since we are addressing not only one gender gap but, seemingly quite a few,
including those that come alonf
the lines of what has come to be called sexual orientarion, I have a question
about the creation process of
the
10 matches
Mail list logo