Re: Move attic to git,

On 28 April 2018 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 13:17:03 CEST sebb a écrit : >> On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> > ok for me >> > >> > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git

Re: Move attic to git,

Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 13:17:03 CEST sebb a écrit : > On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > ok for me > > > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git > > source as well as from svn: that's great > > > > one thing that we should

Re: Move attic to git,

On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > ok for me > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source as > well as from svn: that's great > > one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate source from > generated output:

Re: Move attic to git,

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 12:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > ok for me > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source > as > well as from svn: that's great > > one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate

Re: Move attic to git,

ok for me IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source as well as from svn: that's great one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate source from generated output: only source should go to Git, and generated html should be elsewhere this means

Re: Move attic to git,

On 26 April 2018 at 07:28, Jan Iversen wrote: > Hi > > Any objections against moving attic to git ? OK by me. AFAIK it should not affect much as there are no POMs, DOAPs etc. The only build process that will be affected is the new Buildbot. > using github enables online file