Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-13 Thread Dustin Puryear
-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Tim Fournet Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 2:58 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller As long as they don't turn into flamewars, I don't see any windows-related questions being a pro

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-13 Thread Dustin Puryear
Wow! That's a while. :-) From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Jerald Sheets Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 12:40 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller Wish I di

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-13 Thread Jerald Sheets
> From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On > Behalf Of Tim Fournet > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 2:58 PM > To: general@brlug.net > Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller > > As long as they don't turn into flamewars, I don

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-13 Thread Dustin Puryear
;general@brlug.net" Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:16:15 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller > I guess I didn't realize how many Windows server gurus we have on the Linux list... There are just as many if not more Linux guru

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-10 Thread Tim Fournet
@brlug.net" Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:16:15 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller > I guess I didn't realize how many Windows server gurus we have on the Linux > list... There are just as many if not more Linux guru's on th

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-10 Thread Dustin Puryear
Actually, this is the best place for stupid questions. :) -Original Message- From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Joe Fruchey Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:39 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-10 Thread Mark A. Lappin
> I guess I didn't realize how many Windows server gurus we have on the Linux > list... There are just as many if not more Linux guru's on this list I'm sure. > How can I ask you guys my stupid server questions? I'm guessing > the Linux discussion list is not the place. I'd say it is the place;

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Joe Fruchey
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all > copies of this communication . > -Original Message- > From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf > Of Tim Fournet > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:05 PM > To: general@brlug.net > Subject: Re

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Mark A. Lappin
l Message- From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Tim Fournet Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:05 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller Basically around $30 per user for client access licenses. You need the

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Tim Fournet
Central Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller > a base install of Windows 2003 is really very inexpensive. A base install is not to bad, but when still have to license your network properly << long licensing explanation cut >> Even Windows 2008 is not

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Mark A. Lappin
> a base install of Windows 2003 is really very inexpensive. A base install is not to bad, but when still have to license your network properly << long licensing explanation cut >> Even Windows 2008 is not bad on base pricing. Mark Mark A. Lappin, CCNA, MCSE:Security | Lee Michaels Fine Jewe

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin Puryear
neral-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Tim Fournet Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:04 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller Also, make sure you develop a much bigger understanding of AD on Windows before even trying to to the L

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Jerald Sheets
or > Windows 2003 AD. Life is simpler. > > -Original Message- > From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On > Behalf Of Joe Fruchey > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:37 PM > To: general@brlug.net > Subject: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain cont

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Mark A. Lappin
[quote] Anyhow, I'm finally in a position where I can make decisions, and I've always wondered how feasible Samba would be as a domain controller in a real-world environment. We have about 500 users and 300 computers. What advantages would it offer over Windows Server 2008's Active Directory? (F

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Tim Fournet
11:20:06 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller Very little to be honest. I love Samba, but it's very rare that I see it working better than a Windows DC. Also, sure, you can do some LDAP replication tricks to help with redundancy, but havin

Re: [brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin Puryear
-LDAP DC here for a while, but have since dropped it for Windows 2003 AD. Life is simpler. -Original Message- From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of Joe Fruchey Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:37 PM To: general@brlug.net Subject: [brlug-general] Samba

[brlug-general] Samba as a domain controller

2009-04-09 Thread Joe Fruchey
I've been doing Windows desktop support for ten or twelve years. At work, it's basically me and the server/networking guy. Well, he got a better offer, so he's out the door after Wednesday, which means I'm basically shoehorned into the server/network admin position. It's a role I've wanted to take