El Tuesday 03 April 2007 14:49:21 -ray escribi?:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Fruchey wrote:
> > My other RADIUS question: We can have one server to authenticate
> > everybody, right? Even though they're on different subnets?
>
> Yes, however most radius authentication implementations i've seen are
>
Not a variable, "802.1X" is the name. Wikipedia defines it as:
"IEEE 802.1X is an IEEE standard for port-based Network Access Control;"
I guess if we get technical, it should be a capital X. You can use it on
wired and wireless networks. The other 802.1 standard i'm familiar with is
802.1Q -
Stupid question: Is the 'x' in 802.1x a placeholder/variable, or is it
analogous to the letters in 802.11a/b/g/n?
On 4/3/07, -ray wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Fruchey wrote:
>
> > MAC-based? How is that any better than just filtering the MAC address
> > at the router? Anybody could just spoof
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Fruchey wrote:
> MAC-based? How is that any better than just filtering the MAC address
> at the router? Anybody could just spoof their MAC address and get in.
It's not, but it does give you another layer of defense. And if you're
using WPA, just getting the list of "appr
MAC-based? How is that any better than just filtering the MAC address
at the router? Anybody could just spoof their MAC address and get in.
On 4/3/07, -ray wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Fruchey wrote:
>
> > My other RADIUS question: We can have one server to authenticate
> > everybody, right?
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joe Fruchey wrote:
> My other RADIUS question: We can have one server to authenticate
> everybody, right? Even though they're on different subnets?
Yes, however most radius authentication implementations i've seen are
mac-based. Users mac addresses stored in radius where you
As long as your devices can communicate with your RADIUS server somehow,
then yes
Joe Fruchey wrote:
> Good tips, thanks.
>
> My other RADIUS question: We can have one server to authenticate
> everybody, right? Even though they're on different subnets?
>
> On 4/3/07, Tim Fournet wrote:
>
>>
Good tips, thanks.
My other RADIUS question: We can have one server to authenticate
everybody, right? Even though they're on different subnets?
On 4/3/07, Tim Fournet wrote:
> The problem with a single key for everyone is that once it's known to
> someone you don't want to know it (disgruntled e
The problem with a single key for everyone is that once it's known to
someone you don't want to know it (disgruntled ex-employee, for example)
you have to change it for everyone. This results in a lot of angry calls.
One means of mitigating brute-force password attacks for your 4 number
passwor
OK guys, let me pick your brains...
There is interest in setting up Wi-Fi in our system. Since I've been
working with it for a while now at home, at others' homes, etc., I get
to be "Wi-Fi Guy." Why I take on all these responsibilities for such a
meager salary is beyond me. But I digress...
I've
10 matches
Mail list logo
