You can evaluate XPath and cts:queries against constructed nodes with
cts:contains.
let $docs := for $i in (1 to 100) return document { element foo {$i}}
return $docs[cts:contains(foo,"1")]
I can't imagine a case where saving to the database would speed this up.
Kelly
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 5 M
Ambika
I am not much clear about your requirement. It seems you are not passing
the search options to search:parse API. Please let me know the actual
requirement with code snippet
Regards
Abhishek Srivastav
Systems Engineer
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +91-9883389968
Mailto: abhishek5...@
hi all,
I am performing a search on elements as well attributes using search API. I
am using constraints to do the element-attribute search.
For the xml,
English
I am using,
import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";
at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search
If there's any background executions happening inside the try block (a
cts:element-values call for example, or an xdmp:http-get) they have to be
finished before exiting the try block. Because if they error out, the error
has to be handled in the catch.
Geert's advice is spot-on. Write the app
On Thu, 05 May 2011 11:34:21 -0700, Abhishek53 S
wrote:
> Hi All !
>
> Can someone please suggest the way to extract out bookmarks information
> while PDF to XHTML conversion using CPF in Marklogic.
>
The default conversion application extracts the bookmarks from the PDF
into the file toc.xm
The current 4.1 release is 4.1-10
(http://developer.marklogic.com/products/marklogic-server/4.1). If upgrading
doesn't resolve the problem, I would contact support.
-- Mike
On 5 May 2011, at 15:26 , Mark Boyd wrote:
> I’m using version 4.1-6. The output of the query you specified is
> (“/publ
I'm using version 4.1-6. The output of the query you specified is
("/published/jsp/configuration/cpf/cpf-log.xml" is the path to the log file):
(fn:doc("/published/jsp/configuration/cpf/cpf-log.xml"),
fn:doc("/published/jsp/configuration/cpf/cpf-log.xml"),
fn:doc("/published/jsp/configuration
Hi Abishek,
You were probably triggered by the phrase 'the block must be completely
evaluated before the server can move on'. I'm not familiar with the internals
of MarkLogic Server, but there is nothing against processing the contents of
the try block in parallel threads (provided the code in
What version of the server are you using? What does this show?
xdmp:describe(doc('/path/to/logfile.xml'))
-- Mike
On 5 May 2011, at 11:58 , Mark Boyd wrote:
> I have some code that appends some general log messages to an XML file stored
> in the database during CPF processing of another data
I have some code that appends some general log messages to an XML file stored
in the database during CPF processing of another database. After CPF has
finished, I try to get the document containing the log messages with something
like:
fn:doc("/path/to/logfile.xml")
What I get back is a sequen
Hi All ! Can someone please suggest the way to extract out bookmarks information while PDF to XHTML conversion using CPF in Marklogic.Thanks in advance !Abhishek SrivastavSystems EngineerTata Consultancy ServicesCell:- +91-9883389968Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.comWebsite: http://www.tcs.com___
Thanks Geert for your response.. I agree with you on those lines., that's
the default way we handle exception scenarios in other programming
languages. The question around the try catch block is more with respect to
the impact on parallel processing and lazy evaluations which is applicable
for ML .
Hi Abishek,
What is meant with 'reduce the use of try/catch' is that you should make
sensible use of try/catch and manually throwing exceptions using the error
function. Exception handling is (relatively) slow in most languages, so if you
have the option to prevent a throw and a catch by simply
What are the pointers while exception handling in ml? One of the pointers
we have already heard is
"Reduce the use of try/catch where applicable. This is especially true in
situations where try/catch blocks may be nested. Try/catch blocks have a
negative impact on performance due to the fact that
xmlsh version 1.1.5 has been released and updated on sourceforge
http://www.xmlsh.org
Included is an update to the marklogic and calabash extension modules.
This release is primarily to update to using Saxon 9.3 as well as minor
bug fixes and update to the latest calabash xproc library.
Dear Keith,
I think that is right reason and it is better if you state it clearly in the
document. I'm using it well now as It's only the tool to debug for me at
the moment.
Long Hiep.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Keith L. Breinholt <
breinhol...@ldschurch.org> wrote:
> I need to correct my
Thank you all!
Tim
___
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
I need to correct myself. The install does copy xqdebug.zip directly to the
XQDebug DB so it is curious that any trigger fired.
When the XQDebug DB is created it has the default trigger DB which should be
[none]. I'll make sure that is explicit in the next release.
Let me know if you need an
Hi All
Element word constraint is slightly poor in performance than FIELD over
the same element (if word indexing is enabled to the FIELD) .Is it
justified ?
Thanks in advance !
Abhishek Srivastav
Assistant Systems Engineer
Tata Consultancy Services
Plot B-1, Block EP & GP, Sector 5
Salt Lak
Looking at the error message I believe the trigger fired because XQDebug
install copies the zip file into the Documents database and from there it
unzips and copies the files to the XQDebug DB.
Looks like I need to change that to copy the file to the XQDebug DB directly.
Glad you are up and run
On Wed, 04 May 2011 16:49:20 -0700, Tim Meagher wrote:
> The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error.
> MarkLogic
> Error: XDMP-DOCCOMMENTCHAR
>
> Thank you!
>
> Tim Meagher
>
It means that there is a malformed XML comment.
This is from the XML parser, not the XQuery
parse
Slightly off-topic question: what about when you are searching in-memory
elements? Suppose I contructed 100 xml trees in memory that were each 1K (just
for example), I put them in a sequence, and then I to use XPath against the
sequences of trees to find all values of a particular attribute. No
MarkLogic indexes attributes, and you can query on them, but there are a few
things to keep in mind:
1) attributes are indexed with their parent elements - you can't search across
all attributes independent of their parent elements. So, you can't do */@foo
and expect it to be resolved out of th
Abhishek Srivastav
Assistant Systems Engineer
Tata Consultancy Services
Plot B-1, Block EP & GP, Sector 5
Salt Lake Electronics Complex,
Kolkata - 700 091,West Bengal
India
Cell:- +91-9883389968
Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com
Website: http://www.tcs.com
E
Ambika
The same problem exists when we perform the attribute value operation
over FIELD. The idea is either to restructure your XML content and assign
the attribute value to the element value or you can go for attribute
constraint query but in this scenario it will be constrained search not
t
Hi,
i am doing a search operation in which i will be passing input string to the
search:parse() API and whose result is applying for search.
but i would like make my search query to be performed in attributes values
also.
for eg: when i give '(test) OR (test2) AND (ID123)' as my serach
query(I
Hi Long,
Triggers are stored in a separate database. The default one is called
'Triggers', and is often shared by multiple databases. Just create another
database, go to the XQDebug database configuration, and change the triggers
database setting into this new database. You might need to reinst
Dear Keith,
I received this error when installing XQDebug.
The information of my Marklogic:
- Standard edition (Trial)
- Version 4.2-3.2
Thank to your hint, I have just found out the reason: because I have
installed a trigger which triggers for root directory on Triggers DB. Now,
XQDebug is runnin
28 matches
Mail list logo
