Hi David,
Thanks, I had been looking for linux-kind and cpu details, but hadn’t found
them yet. Yes, I meant actually installing it. Not sure about those
processors, but it sounds like they are going to be a problem. ML 6 and up
is only available in 64-bit, and those Marvell processors appear to
I'll enter a ticket and see where it goes. Thanks!
-Bob
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Geert Josten wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
>
>
> Support can tell you best if it is known or not. I’m guessing not, first
> time I saw it mentioned on this list at least. Not sure whether the spec
> requires support
.marklogic.com<mailto:General@developer.marklogic.com>
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://developer.marklogic.com/pipermail/general/attachments/20131017/37653c17/attachment-0001.html
Yes, if you want all of your word searches to run over a subset of elements in
your document, that's the best way to do it.
You might also look at fields, if you want to be able to do this selectively.
You can create field-based constraints for the REST API to use, so that your
query grammar c
I think you may want to look at the word query configuration to
include/exclude elements:
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/admin/wordquery#id_77008
John
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Erik Hennum wrote:
> Hi, Gnana:
>
> Can you provide more detail about what you're trying to accomplish?
>
>
Hi,
Friend of mine has a Synology DS2411+
(http://www.synology.com/us/products/DS2411+/index.php), and was curious
if it would be possible to install MarkLogic on such a machine. Anyone out
here with experience or knowledge about this?
Cheers,
Geert
M.Sc. G.P.H. (Geert) Josten
Senior Developer
Hi, Vijay:
Are you running the search with the unfiltered option? It might be necessary
to use a filtered search to eliminate all false positives. The usage notes in
the documentation also has some tips on configuration position indexes to
minimize false positives:
http://docs.marklogic.com/
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your reply. I just tried using cts:and-query(()) within nested
query. However, the result is same. I am still getting false positive results
in the response (i.e.) search also returns xmls having element alone.
Regards,
Vijay
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com
Please remove me from mailing list.
On Oct 17, 2013 10:17 AM, "Vijayasekar Padmanaban" <
vijayaseka...@infosys.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> We have got an requirement for using nested queries within search:search
> API. However, using nested queries returns false positive results. Below is
Hi, Vijay:
To test the existence of an element, you can use a nested empty
cts:and-query(). For more detail, see:
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/search-dev/cts_query#id_71643
So, you might try:
cts:element-query(xs:QName(“child1”),
cts:element-value-query(xs:QName(“child2
Hi, Gnana:
Can you provide more detail about what you're trying to accomplish?
I'm wondering with the requirements can be met through booleans in structured
search:
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/search-dev/structured-query#id_83674
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/search-dev/structured
HI. I believe this sample gives you what you wish. Please note the
sample doc with your terms used
#
let $doc := This is a document that contains information
related to Data, Google and company. And more Google and more data and
more COMPANY..
let $term
Hi, Pragya:
In XQuery, the iterated block extends from the "for" statement (through any
intervening "for" statements) to the "return" statement. In this code
fragment, that means $i is processed separately (and $doc is returned) for each
$temp.
for $i in $temp
...
return $doc
If you want to
Hi
Is there any way to include/exclude set of elements in a fragment while
searching?
For example:
...
While performing search (REST API based), I want my search (keyword or
constraints based) to look into few elements l
14 matches
Mail list logo
