Hi,
I have a cts:value-tuples() query which fetches the json array result. The
query runs on aprroximately 3lac xmls and the result set contains about 30k
elements in json array.
It takes about 48sec to run this query.
Is there a way to reduce its execution time.
I have used range indexes for
Hi,
I am facing issue while using custom inference rules in marklogic 8.0.
Here is the scenario:
1. create data
PREFIX rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
PREFIX place: http://example.com/places/
PREFIX ex: http://example.com/
PREFIX bank: http://example.com/banks/
INSERT DATA
{
Hi Shruti,
If you want to expose a UI in which an end user can navigate through all 30k
values, I’d suggest applying pagination. You could have a look at the
/v1/values REST api endpoint, but I don’t expect it to be faster, or not much.
In the end you have to serialize a large number of
Hi Shruti,
I think that you will find that if you wrap the cts:value-tuples in a count
that it will run much faster, maybe even in sub-sec. Most time is consumed by
serializing 30k json arrays. Do you really need all 30k items, or would top 20
be sufficient?
Cheers,
Geert
From: shruti kapoor
Hi Geert,
I need all 30k results and since the response is in json array, I convert
it into a map first then each map goes through some data enrichment to
finally generate an html table.
Could I useany other search api ?
Thanks
Shruti
On 6 Jul 2015 01:50, Geert Josten geert.jos...@marklogic.com
Hi Prateek,
I see two options:
1. Specify ruleset programmatically using a sem:ruleset-store (see
http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/semantics/inferencing#id_pgfId-920824)
2. Use default rulesets, which is a config setting for databases (see
Hi Prateek,
Which error do you get?
Cheers,
Geert
From: prateekjai...@gmail.commailto:prateekjai...@gmail.com
prateekjai...@gmail.commailto:prateekjai...@gmail.com
Reply-To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
general@developer.marklogic.commailto:general@developer.marklogic.com
Date: Sunday, July
Hi Prateek,
It would help if you provide more detail. If you run this query from Qconsole,
against which database are you running it then (the dropdown at the top of
QConsole)? And does this database contain triple data? You can discover that
using the Explore button which should reveal XML
Thanks Geert,
I have already created rule for inferencing by:
xquery version 1.0-ml;
xdmp:document-insert(
'/rules/bankAt.rules',
text{
'
PREFIX rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
PREFIX rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema/
PREFIX ex: http://example.com/
PREFIX gn:
Hi Geert,
I am running this script now. It runs w/o error but doesnt return ant
results. I am not sure if, I am missing something here. Also, I am not sure
how to pass my data in query like, I want to get all banks in uk.
let $my-store := sem:ruleset-store(/rules/bankAt.rules, sem:store() )
Hi, zisedeqing:
You might consider writing queries with cts:search() so you don't need to look
into the interpretation of the FLWOR expression.
The following query should get close to what you want (though you may see some
false positives if you run unfiltered without position indexes).
Thanks Rob , I had got the query plan by used xdmp:query-trace(), but marklogic
will really execute the xquery when i used xdmp:query-trace().
Is there another method that i can get the query plan and the query will be not
really exeuted?
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 02:43:12 +
The xquery is:
for $x in collection('test')/catalog/product
where $x/@dept = 'WMN'
return $x;
I had created attribute range index on product/@dept, I would like to know
whether the query will use the range index when marklogic process it.
so i ues the xdmp:plan to get the query plan, but i only
Hi,
xdmp:plan() requires a partially searchable XPath expression or a cts:search()
expression. It doesn't accept xQuery like that. More information:
https://docs.marklogic.com/xdmp:plan
Here's an example that would work for you:
xdmp:plan(collection('test')/catalog/product/@dept)
Another
14 matches
Mail list logo
