Thanks a lot Gael !! I will fiddle it. :)
Thanks and Regards,
[Email_CBE.gif]Abhishek Jain
Associate Consultant
Capgemini India | Hyderabad
People matter, results count.
From: Gaƫl YIMEN YIMGA [mailto:yimeng...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 4:34 AM
To: Jain, Abhishek
Cc: MarkLogic De
t;
>
>
> From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com [general-bounces@developer.
> marklogic.com] on behalf of Shiv Shankar [shiv.shivshan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:01 AM
> To: general@developer.marklogic.com
> Subject: [MarkLo
Hi, Shiv:
A patch request returns a 204 if none of the operations match on the patched
document.
That's an indication to check the paths in the operations to make sure they
match the structure and vocabulary of the target JSON document.
The patch from your earlier post would change this docume
Hi,
If anyone can share their experiences or knowledge in terms of which one works
better in terms of performance, it will be very helpful.
Thanks.
-Sudheer
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com
[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Yalaverthi,
Sudheer (LNG-RD
Just wondering why MarkLogic does not make codepoint the default collation
if it results in a 10% performance improvement.
Tim
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com
[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Yalaverthi,
Sudheer (LNG-RDU)
Sent: Tuesday, August 23,
The old email from Mary explains more than I would know.
My takeaway, take it for what it's worth, is:
Use the correct collation for your 'text' indexes; use codepoint for
'value' indexes like UIDs and such.
You won't be worrying about whether your UID has diacritics, or whether it
sorts accordi
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:46:40 -0700, Tim Meagher wrote:
> Just wondering why MarkLogic does not make codepoint the default
> collation
> if it results in a 10% performance improvement.
>
>
> Tim
Let's not confuse the default appserver collation with the collation you
might want to use on a ra