>
> apply-in-new-transaction-invoker.xqy:
> -
> declare namespace aint = "apply-in-new-transaction";
>
> declare option xdmp:update "true";
>
> declare variable $aint:function as xdmp:function external;
> declare variable $aint:params as item()* external;
ation by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message
> > to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
> >
> >
> > Fr
.com
> To: general@developer.marklogic.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:27:21 -0700
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Cannot apply an update function from a
> query
>
> Yes.
>
> If you want to force update mode, you can use this option in the prolog of
> your calli
r.marklogic.com
[general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of seme...@hotmail.com
[seme...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:27 PM
To: general@developer.marklogic.com
Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Cannot apply an update function from a
query
Ok. So did static analysis not
1 14:19:32 -0700
To: general@developer.marklogic.com
Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Cannot apply an update function from a
query
On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:08 PM, seme...@hotmail.com wrote:Am I going to have to
xdmp:eval or xdmp:invoke the function and declare it to be in a separate
t
On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:08 PM, seme...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Am I going to have to xdmp:eval or xdmp:invoke the function and declare it to
> be in a separate transaction?
Yes. You can eval or invoke the function or the apply of the function.
-jh-
___
G
I was trying to xdmp:apply an xdmp:function and got the error "Cannot apply an
update function from a query". I don't really want to change the calling
function to an update query because most of the time it will be just a query
query.
So I'm wondering what my options are. Am I going to have
