: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:42 PM
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] search for non-existing elements
Hi David,
> > My guess is that the non-existance of elements is not
> > indexed. I would think there would be some way in ML to
: Thursday, November 19, 2009 16:45
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] search for non-existing elements
To really tell if it will help, try adding an xdmp:query-trace to your query
and then look at how many fragments are selected. I did the following
experim
id...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com
[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Geert Josten
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 16:16
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] search for non-ex
Hi David,
> > My guess is that the non-existance of elements is not
> > indexed. I would think there would be some way in ML to
> > index that information but I cant find it.
>
> It is pretty difficult to put something in an index that isn't there..
> :-)
>
>
> I read in
neral-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Geert Josten
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 16:16
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] search for non-existing elements
Hi David,
> Each conceptDef is a fragment (its parent, terminology is a fragment
> Root)
Hi David,
> Each conceptDef is a fragment (its parent, terminology is a
> fragment Root) I rewrote it as this :
I don't think that defining 'terminology' as fragment Root puts each
conceptDef in its own fragment. Actually, as 'terminology' seems to be
the root element of your document, it would
Hi David,
> Each conceptDef is a fragment (its parent, terminology is a
> fragment Root) I rewrote it as this :
I don't think that defining 'terminology' as fragment Root puts each conceptDef
in its own fragment. Actually, as 'terminology' seems to be the root element of
your document, it woul
m] On Behalf Of Danny Sokolsky
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:02 PM
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] search for non-existing elements
The FLOWR is not likely to make it faster, as it has to do the same amount of
work.
I think you said that con
ur test as well.
-Danny
-Original Message-
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com
[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:40 AM
To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion
Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] sear
> doc("/NDFRT/NDFRT_Public_2009.05.12_TDE.xml")//conceptDef[empty(definingConcepts/concept)]
> This is taking about 10 seconds right now.
> Any suggestions ? Thanks !
...just a suggestion, but try rewriting it as a flowr expression, such as:
for $c in //conceptDef
where fn:empty($c/definingCo
I'm learning that cts:search() is vastly faster then xpath expressions
...
So I'm trying to come up with a cts:search() for the following
doc("/NDFRT/NDFRT_Public_2009.05.12_TDE.xml")//conceptDef[empty(defining
Concepts/concept)]
This is searching for all conceptDef elements which have
11 matches
Mail list logo
