This is not a rant, but constructive criticism.
1) as I mentioned already, I think that having gump (or forrest or
whatever) generate static HTML pages creates more problems than it
solves. I think we should move the architecture with something like this
metadata -> gump -> database -> jenny ->
Scott Sanders wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >>> and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
> >>> python.
> >>
> >> ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
> >
> > it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
> > which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
> >
Scott Sanders wrote:
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a H
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer, I hope you
Leo Simons wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
sorry :-(
apologies, you guys, but I am kinda frustrated by all this.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time!
I know. :-(
but dudes, be ready for something pretty wild ;-)
and you
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time!
and you can bet your ass
that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
- LSD
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 October 2004 19:26
> To: Apache Gump
> Subject: [rant] I hate this gump
>
> This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
>
> Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days a
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 2 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty success
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty-plus failed
*** G U M P
[E
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's
likely to continue since I have no idea on how to fix the thing.
I spent a few hours browsing around the gump html pages. I'm sorry, they
are not only uselessly full
All of the Excalibur projects are declared in a Gump definition which is
available to all Apache committers in the gump cvs module. The file in
question is:
/gump/project/excalibur.xml
Please note there this is a gump/maven issue that results in the
generation of inconsistent property files
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project gump-test has an issue affecting its community integration, and has been
outstanding
11 matches
Mail list logo