Killed Gump on VMGump

2005-07-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, the run that started Sunday evening still wasn't finished, probably because svn and cvs were unreachable or slow. I fouind it had become unresponsive and a few cvs processes were hanging so I simply killed everything. Stefan --

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-19 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Thomas wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > >>On 18-07-2005 15:33, "Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>>If I don't get around this cocoon problems I have I'll start a new >>>presentation application (not dyngump) with J2EE and Struts. >>> >>> >> >>I'll chuck in 2 cents: I don't want "J2E

Re: Problem running Apache Gump [vmgump-public]

2005-07-19 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, In these notifications, the ASF spam check (whatever that is) injects a header; X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.6 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,INVALID_DATE,NO_REAL_NAME And I personally, check if INVALID_DATE is there and send it to spambox. Gumps date format; Date: 19 Jul 2005

Re: Some clarification for a ./configure build

2005-07-19 Thread Graham Leggett
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hmm, can you send the complete descriptors so that I can have a closer look? Will do when I have access to that machine again tomorrow. Another thing I noticed - if I commented out the tags that created --with-hoops and --with-monacoxml, suddenly the hoops-feed projec

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-07-19 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project nekohtml (in module nekohtml) failed *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: P

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-07-19 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project nekohtml (in module nekohtml) failed *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: P