Re: Help for WSRP4J

2006-01-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bill Barker wrote: The current Gump Pluto is built from pluto/branches/pluto-1.0.2. Ah, great. I haven't looked into it enough to see why it isn't good enough for ws4p4j. Another dependency to the pluto-portal was missing. I just added it. So let's way for the next run :) Thanks! Carsten

Re: Help for WSRP4J

2006-01-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Bill Barker wrote: The current Gump Pluto is built from pluto/branches/pluto-1.0.2. Ah, great. I haven't looked into it enough to see why it isn't good enough for ws4p4j. Another dependency to the pluto-portal was missing. I just added it. So let's way for

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

2006-01-19 Thread Martin van den Bemt
If you can wait till the weekend, I'll see if I can have a go at it.. Also with fixed dependencies we try to use the latest versions.. Mvgr, Martin Thomas Dudziak wrote: Hi, these builds are failing because OJB needs Antlr version 2.7.5 whereas gump still uses 2.7.3. Is there any chance that

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

2006-01-19 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Thanx Stefan :) Mvgr, Martin Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these builds are failing because OJB needs Antlr version 2.7.5 whereas gump still uses 2.7.3. Is there any chance that gump could also provide the newer antlr version ? I hope

Re: Help for WSRP4J

2006-01-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are now back to an old error during the build wrt to some Axis classes. I have absolutely no clue what might be wrong there. Can anyone help, please? Sure. Unfortunately we seem to be investigating this about half a year too

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project packaged-jmock (in module cocoon) failed

2006-01-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jörg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder why so many projects depend on *our* packaged jmock. Ahh, for historical reasons. I was experimenting with building jmock and it simply will never work (a backwards incomatible change in JUnit in the dead 3.8.x branch made

Re: Regarding gump failure of db-ojb and db-ojb-from-packages

2006-01-19 Thread Thomas Dudziak
On 1/19/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope 2.7.6 is going to work as well 8-) Think that won't be a problem. And even if, then I'll update OJB to use 2.7.6. Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2006-01-19 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project authx-core (in module authx) failed *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: