Re: Direction of Gump

2023-03-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2023-03-05, Mark Thomas wrote: >> I'm not suggesting terminating Gump but I wonder whether there is any >> benefit in keeping it as a TLP if no other project is interested >> anymore. > What are the other options if it isn't a TLP? Close it down > obviously. Anything else? Things that come to

Re: Direction of Gump

2023-03-05 Thread Adam Jack
Hey Gentlemen, I have been struggling to maintain connection with ASF for many years (since my technology life went a different direction) and, despite good intentions, I struggle to show up at meetings/pass along my proxy, etc. I finally accepted the reality and went to emeritus last year, in the

Re: Direction of Gump

2023-03-05 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/02/2023 11:56, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all after Gump's last board report one of the members asked whether we aren't disturbed by not adding any new committers for many years now (actually I don't believe anybody who is a not a PMC member already has posted anything to ths list for years)

Board report Draft

2023-03-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GUMP/20230315 is the current draft, I'll send it out next Wednesday. This time it is not a verbatim copy of the report I keep sending but rather contains two extra paragraphs. In "Project Activity" > Triggered by the board feedback to the last