Nothing much, and as Leo said, that can be hard to change.
In this case, only as hard as a few people finding/stating it gets in their
way. Consistency is key for ASF processing artifacts automatically.
Changed. :)
regards,
Adam
Don't wast too much time on changing it, I just thought it was incorrect
spelling, but now I heard it is correct spelling, I am happy with it:)
Mvgr,
Martin
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 14:54, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Nothing much, and as Leo said, that can be hard to change.
In this case, only as
Date: 2004-06-08T08:13:00
Editor: 67.234.191.3
Wiki: Gump Wiki
Page: ArtefactsRepository
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/gump/ArtefactsRepository
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -22,9 +22,11 @@
== Gump
Date: 2004-06-08T08:23:50
Editor: 67.234.191.3
Wiki: Gump Wiki
Page: ArtefactsRepository
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/gump/ArtefactsRepository
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -8,6 +8,15 @@
/!\ '''WORK
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 06:20, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Isn't it an Artifact instead of Artefact ? (if both are correct
disregard this mail :)
It is one of those US vs UK spelling. I couldn't care much, as long as it is
consistent, i.e. if ASF went ahead and said ; US English across the
