On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>get B that A says it depends on (out of timestamp)
>>>build it
>> against which versions of B's dependencies? dated or latest?
>
> uh, recursion, gosh, didn't think about that. What would you
> suggest?
Avoid recursion
> Project A says it needs Project B version 1.5 or better. So try with
> the latest B... follow the algorithm above - the algorithm is the same
> but the actions are different. Version would just get the Jar, not try
> building from scratch and instead of sending emails, would simply
> back-off to
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I'm in a ISO meeting so I don't have much time,
...and then goes on to propose a new algorithm that causes the
integration to try to "back-off" until something builds ;)
get latest B
build it
if successful {
get latest A
build it against latest B
if successf
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
sorry for the delay, I'm so behind my email it hurts!
It concerns me that people are very silent about this.
see above :-D. The ideas are good. I'm just working to get enough python
knowledge under the belt to be able to contribute a little more than
just ideas and meta
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
sorry for the delay, I'm so behind my email it hurts! Crete was
wonderful though ;-)
It concerns me that people are very silent about this. Did I go to far?
I love the idea, But I would implement it with out the emails first,
Then add the emails
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
sorry for the delay, I'm so behind my email it hurts! Crete was
wonderful though ;-)
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[nightly build like proposal]
get latest B
build it
if successful {
get latest A
build it against latest B
i
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[nightly build like proposal]
> get latest B
> build it
> if successful {
> get latest A
> build it against latest B
> if successful {
>// do nothing since everything is cool
> } else {
>send e
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
+Currently our [http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/#Project+Summary
success rate]
+is 75.34% with 592 projects.
It got into the 80s until one sole unit test in one project brought a bunch
of stuff tumbling down, and it hasn't been fixed. :(
Personally, I'm starting to but
