The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Adam Jack
Created: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 5:32 PM
Body:
FOG has (for now) be redefined as 'historical odds of success',
which is still not a good FOG Factor, but more mathematically useful.
See: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gum
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Stephen McConnell
Created: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 5:19 PM
Body:
One immediate problem with fog -
0 fog == total clarity
0 clarity == total fog
But this is opposite to the current fog factory. A higher fog factory is app
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Adam Jack
Created: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 3:43 PM
Body:
I'd love to fix this, I agree with much of the objection, but I'd need suggestions. I
suspect there is no such thing as a single 'FOG Factor' (to suit all purposes) but
m
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Daniel Savarese
Created: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 5:47 PM
Body:
Priority should be Minor. I didn't notice it and let the default
go through. Further discussion should probably occur on the Gump
mailing list. Gump is probably goi
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Daniel Savarese
Created: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 5:24 PM
Body:
I made some typos that I can't appear to go back and edit. Just
ignore the one or two garbled sentences since they were redundant
anyway.
